ifn β Search Results


95
R&D Systems mouse ifn beta elisa kit
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Mouse Ifn Beta Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse ifn beta elisa kit/product/R&D Systems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse ifn beta elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MedChemExpress recombinant human il 6
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Recombinant Human Il 6, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human il 6/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human il 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems anti human ifn β antibody
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Anti Human Ifn β Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human ifn β antibody/product/R&D Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human ifn β antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti ifn β
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Anti Ifn β, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti ifn β/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ifn β - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti il 6 ab
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Anti Il 6 Ab, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti il 6 ab/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti il 6 ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
R&D Systems dy8234
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Dy8234, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dy8234/product/R&D Systems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dy8234 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems elisa kit r d systems 32100 murine ifn b elisa kit r d systems 42400 human ifn b elisa kit r d systems difnb0 experimental models
B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific <t>ELISA</t> or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.
Elisa Kit R D Systems 32100 Murine Ifn B Elisa Kit R D Systems 42400 Human Ifn B Elisa Kit R D Systems Difnb0 Experimental Models, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/elisa kit r d systems 32100 murine ifn b elisa kit r d systems 42400 human ifn b elisa kit r d systems difnb0 experimental models/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
elisa kit r d systems 32100 murine ifn b elisa kit r d systems 42400 human ifn b elisa kit r d systems difnb0 experimental models - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
R&D Systems human ifn β elisa
FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β <t>ELISA</t> (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Human Ifn β Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human ifn β elisa/product/R&D Systems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human ifn β elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems human ifn β
FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β <t>ELISA</t> (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Human Ifn β, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human ifn β/product/R&D Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human ifn β - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Sino Biological interferon β response elements
FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β <t>ELISA</t> (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Interferon β Response Elements, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/interferon β response elements/product/Sino Biological
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
interferon β response elements - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech human il6
FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β <t>ELISA</t> (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Human Il6, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human il6/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human il6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Addgene inc ifn β promoter luciferase reporter
FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β <t>ELISA</t> (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Ifn β Promoter Luciferase Reporter, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ifn β promoter luciferase reporter/product/Addgene inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ifn β promoter luciferase reporter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific ELISA or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Type-I Interferon is Critical for FasL Expression on Lung Cells to Determine the Severity of Influenza

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055321

Figure Lengend Snippet: B6 mice were intranasally infected with 10 5 (closed triangle) or 10 2 (open square) pfu/head of the PR/8 virus. At 0, 3 or 5 DPI, the BALF of these mice were isolated. The amount of IFN- ß or total protein contained in these samples was assessed by mouse IFN- ß specific ELISA or BCA protein assay, respectively. The amounts of IFN- ß were normalized by that of the total protein in each sample. “N.D.” means not detected.

Article Snippet: The amount of IFN-β was assessed by mouse IFN-beta ELISA kit (R&D systems, Abingdon, UK).

Techniques: Infection, Virus, Isolation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay

FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β ELISA (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.

Journal: Frontiers in microbiology

Article Title: Paracrine IFN Response Limits ZIKV Infection in Human Sertoli Cells.

doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.667146

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 2 | IFN response limits ZIKV infection in Sertoli cells. SC were exposed to ZIKV for 1h (MOI 3) and ZIKV infection and MX1 protein levels were evaluated by (A) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using mouse monoclonal against the ZIKV E protein (green) and rabbit polyclonal against MX1 (red), respectively. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β ELISA (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used to normalize fold-change for all gene expression assays. Significance determined by Student’s t-test for all assays, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Images were taken at 100× magnification. (B) ZIKV titers in SC supernatant were (black line curve) determined by plaque assay (n = 3 for each time point) and the percentage of ZIKV-positive cells (green line curve) was quantified via IFA (n = 2 field per coverslip for each time point). (C) Changes in MX1 protein levels were quantified by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFA coverslips (n = 4) from each time point using ImageJ software, reported as MFI fold-change compared to mock. (D) Western blot analysis of MX1 protein levels at 24 and 48 h post-infection. b-actin and IRF3 were used as loading controls and each lane represents an independent experiment. (E) Secreted IFN-β in SC supernatant (n = 4 for each time point), determined by human IFN-β ELISA (R&D Systems); dotted line denotes detection limit of assay. (F) Zoomed images of IFA to depict co-localization of ZIKV and MX1 at 120h post-infection. (G,H) SC were treated with 5 pg/mL (1 IU/mL) of recombinant human IFN-β (rhIFN-β; R&D systems) 24 h prior to and upon ZIKV infection (MOI 1) and were replenished with the rhIFN-β (5 pg/mL) at 24 h post-infection. (G) ZIKV genome copies were measured in infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR. (H) Gene expression of MX1 and IFIT1 was evaluated at 48 h post-infection by RT-qPCR in both mock and infected SC with and without IFN-β treatment and reported as fold-change compared to mock untreated.

Techniques: Infection, Staining, Plaque Assay, Software, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Recombinant, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression